Empagliflozin and colchicine in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blinded, three-arm parallel-group, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: There is accumulating evidence regarding the potential benefits of empagliflozin in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Based on the literature, colchicine could also reduce the risk of MI and death in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, trials investigating the effects of the combination of empagliflozin with colchicine and high-dose empagliflozin monotherapy in this setting are lacking. METHODS: In this trial, 106 non-diabetic participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following recent ST-elevation MI were randomly assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg/day, empagliflozin 10 mg/day plus colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily, or empagliflozin 25 mg/day groups within 72 h after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study's primary outcomes were the changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) over 12 weeks. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of individuals were statistically similar between the study groups. Changes in NYHA functional class over 12 weeks were not significantly different between the study groups. hs-CRP was significantly reduced in all groups (all P < 0.001); however, there was no significant change between the groups over the study period. Changes in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), LVEF, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) during the research period did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that neither the combination treatment of empagliflozin 10 mg/day with colchicine nor the monotherapy of empagliflozin 25 mg/day was superior to empagliflozin 10 mg/day in terms of changes in clinical, inflammatory, and echocardiographic outcome parameters in patients with recent MI with reduced LVEF over 3 months. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial ID: IRCT20111206008307N39. Registration date: 27 October 2022. https://www.irct.ir/trial/66216.

SARS-CoV-2 and probable lung cancer risk.

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global crisis with a growing number of mortalities and morbidities worldwide. Despite performing numerous researches, there are still considerable unrevealed details regarding the long-term complications and post-infection immunity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Based on pathophysiological features, SARS-CoV-2 may act similarly as an oncovirus in the lung. This letter summarized three possible oncogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 that may be associated with lung cancer development.

Remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19; an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a global health crisis. Considering the recent food and drug administration (FDA) approval of remdesivir as the first officially approved agent for COVID-19 treatment, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remdesivir administration in COVID-19 patients. A systematic literature search was done through MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, and bioRxiv from their inception to December 22nd, 2020. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) were entered into the meta-analysis. The results showed that remdesivir administration was associated with a significant improvement in the 28-day recovery (RR = 1.09, 95%CI, 1.04-1.15), low flow oxygen support through days one to 14 (RR = 2.88, 95%CI, 1.80-4.60), and invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement through days 14-28 of the follow-up time (RR = 5.34, 95%CI, 2.37-12.05). The risk of experiencing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was significantly lower (RR = 0.75, 95%CI, 0.63-0.90) in the remdesivir group than the comparison/control group. The pooled median difference of the time to clinical improvement was 2.99 (95%CI = 2.71-3.28), which did not remain significant during the sensitivity analysis. The clinical output comparison of the 5-day and 10-day remdesivir courses revealed that the 5-day regimen might provide similar benefits while causing fewer serious ADRs than 10-day. The current meta-analysis provided an updated evaluation of scientific evidence on the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients. Performing adequate well-designed RCTs are needed to show more accurate results.

A comprehensive review on sarilumab in COVID-19.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, or SARS-CoV-2), continues to spread all around the world. Despite the emergency of COVID-19 worldwide, remdesivir is the only treatment that has been recently approved to treat the diseases, and other effective therapies are still lacking. SARS-CoV-2 may cause severe illness in 20% of patients. Based on available data, there is an association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) and severe COVID-19. Sarilumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody binding to both membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptors with high affinity and has been considered for off-label use in the treatment of COVID-19.Areas covered: The present article reviews recently published literature focusing on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 induced cytokine storm, the potential therapeutic role, and important clinical issues of sarilumab in the treatment of COVID-19 patients.Expert opinion: The off-label treatment administration is unavoidable in the critical situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further efforts should be directed to determine mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 induced immune dysregulation as well as indications of sarilumab in the patients with COVID-19 to minimize concerns regarding its off-label administration.

A Comprehensive Review of Tocilizumab in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Currently, the world is facing the pandemic of a novel strain of beta-coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most devastating complication of SARS-CoV-2. It was indicated that cytokine-release syndrome and dominantly interleukin (IL)-6 play a central role in the pathophysiology of ARDS related to the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Despite the global emergency of the disease, at this time, there are no proven therapies for the management of the disease. Tocilizumab is a potential recombinant monoclonal antibody against IL-6 and currently is under investigation for the management of ARDS in patients with COVID-19. Given these points, we reviewed the current evidence regarding the potential therapeutic role of tocilizumab and its important clinical issues in the treatment of ARDS related to COVID-19.